Is that project cap?
Paste a CA, a site or an X post. Four AI agents test what it claims, then a judge grades it, with receipts.
Or tag @nocapcheck on X under any project's post. The agents reply with the verdict and the card.opens the site in a headless browser and uses it
–
CA, launch block, holders, the dev wallet, burns
–
X account, repo, whether the code does what it says
–
reads every receipt, writes the verdict
–
- Every step, read and receipt from the four agents streams here.
Running now
- Nothing in the queue right now.
Latest verdicts
- –
Tag @nocapcheck under any project's post
No site to open, no CA to copy. Reply under a project's post on X with the tag; the same four agents run and the bot answers in the thread.
- Reply with @nocapcheckunder the project's post, or quote it. A CA, a site link or a $TICKER in the thread works too.
- Four agents check itthe site, the chain, the X account and the code. About a minute.
- The verdict lands in the threadCAP to NO CAP with a score, the live mcap and volume, the card, and a link to every receipt. A coin under $10k gets a short "too small" reply.
MOSTLY NO CAP (80/100): Paste box works: real data in 2 s from 9 API calls, live counters updating. · coin: NEUTRAL $170k mcap · $148k 24h vol · $34k liq · 31h old · x.com/solvetscan · CA 3734…pump a claim check, not an audit of the team. dyor. https://nocap-preview.node-7c4f.workers.dev/c/ew1ji67e
–/100
The judge writes one line from the receipts. Every number in it is in a receipt below.
| What it claims | Result |
|---|---|
| The project's claims, in its own words, and what the agents found. | |
Receipts
- Every receipt the agents collected, numbered, with a link to where it came from.
How the score was made
| Each point of the score, itemised. |
Caught today
Every new launch with its own site that crosses $10k, run through the same four agents. Real checks only.